If the British ancestors of Alfred William Finch (1854-1930) had moved to Paris instead of to Brussels in 1818, the artist might be better known today. But he would not have become Belgium's "first divisionist painter"in 1888, according to Emile Verhaeren. And if Finch had been able to earn his living from painting, he might not have moved to Finland in 1897, a place even more remote from Paris, center of the 19th century art world. It was the young Willy Finch who invited James McNeill Whistler to join the first exhibition of Les XX in 1884. During numerous visits to Great Britain, Finch began working in ceramics. Fellow artists Anna Boch, whose father was in charge of Keramic Pottery at La Louviere, got Finch a job as a painter-decorator. For this reason he was invited to direct the ceramics department at the Iris Company in Porvoo, Finland. Finch also promoted the work of painters he admired, like Whistler and his divisionist inspiration, Paul Signac.
A Box at the Theater from 1896 may be Finch's best-known work, but the inclusion of human figures is atypical. Look closely, though, and you will see divisionist techniques at work. Clothing and upholstery are rendered in a series of lines in complementary colors. The armchair appears dark but is actually a mixture of greens and
oranges.
In a few short productive years, Finch created a satisfying body of work. These paintings exert a strong horizontal pull through the artist's long foreground views. This broad foreground gave Finch space to work divisionist magic before our eyes. Magic is a good word for the technique, based on theories of visual perception that have proved somewhat lacking, scientifically.
The wonder is that a technique so painstaking resulted in works that quiver with movement. The sheep are wandering off the road, the tides are coming and going, the shadows are moving across the fields, as though we were there watching. You can imagine that you see the sun's movement.

Images:
Box At TheTheatre, 1896, Belgian Royal Museum Of Fine Arts, Brussels.
Decorative Tile, undated, Ceramics Museum, Ardennes, Belgium.
Country Road By The North Sea, 1888, Turku Art Museum, F
inland.
The Road To Nieuport, 1888, Minneapolis Institute of Arts.
Haystacks, 1889, Belgian Royal Museum Of Fine Arts, Brussels.
The Channel At Nieuport, 1889, British National Gallery, London.
Orchard at La Louviere, 1890, Finnish National Gallery Of Art, Helsinki.
The Cliffs At South Foreland, undated, Finnish National Gallery Of Art, Helsinki.
Sunset Landscape, 1892, Turku Art Museum, Finland.



5 comments:
Pointillism/Divisionism seems such a reductive, quasi-scientific approach to art, it's hard to feel it could ever have worked - yet, just for a short period, so many artists used it to capture an idea of light that had never been described before. I love your notion that these works "quiver with movement" - that's exactly right.
I put off the Belgian Divisionists until I could learn more about Anna Boch. I will try to do her work justice, even though it won't be enough. The 'science' of Divisionism may have been questionable, but it worked for art. It's difficult to imagine an insipid Divisionist painting.
Nice post on Divisionism.
I'm an artist working in a style of Divisionism with large cupped strokes of oil paint. Technique is called "Daubism" as the paint is applied in daubs with a palette knife.
Dena Tollefson
http://www.denatollefson.com
http://www.denatollefson.blogspot.com
Welcome, Dena, and thanks for the "daubism".
i have gone through this blog. i found it really interesting fot my job and my future career
study and earn
Post a Comment