"As Delacroix wrote is his diary, 'One never paints violently enough.' In the light experienced in the south of France, everything sparkles and the whole painting vibrates. Take your picture to Paris: the blues turn to grey....Therefore one thing is necessary in painting: heightening the tone." - Pierre Bonnard, translated from the French by Julian Bell
Typically, in a Bonnard landscape vegetation functions as a frame that separates what is far from what is near. From his perch the lush, variously colored plants form a kind of tapestry laid out before the viewer; when figures appear against such a backdrop they are often the last things we notice.
The answer begins with Georges Bemberg (1915-2011), the very model of a cosmopolite, twentieth century edtion. Born into a wealthy family in Argentina, Bemberg grew up in France and graduated from Harvard University. He was a pianist, who also wrote novels, for instance Quatre mains: nouvelles (Four Hands: Novellas) published in 1953, but his true profession seems to have been that of a traveling art collector. Bemberg, like Barnes, created a foundation to share his collection with the public, hitting on the happy solution of collaborating with the city of Toulouse, owner of the Hotel Assezat, a sixteenth century building in the Renaissance style, nicely suited to be re-purposed as a museum. It was built (c. 1555) as a hotel particulier, the French term for a palace owned by wealthy non-royalty, in this case the manufacturer Pierre Assezat. The Fondation Bemberg opened to the public in 1994, with paintings, sculpture, furniture, and antiquarian books from five centuries but it is the modern French art that is it greatest attraction.
Critics have long chewed over the question “Was Bonnard an easel painter or a decorative painter?” The artist managed to have it both ways. In Bonnard’s later paintings, color is the measure of sensation; lines, especially those used to frame an image are the anchor as the artist attempts to capture on canvas what the constantly moving human eye sees. Marthe, Bonnard's long-time mistress and then wife, appears seated at a table; she is bracketed doubly, by a window in the background at her left and by a strip of matching color, of undetermined function to her right. (see above) Even in a still life such as Nature morte aux citrons the strong lines are predominately vertical. (see below)
By now, you can probably place the locale in Bonnard's paintings by referring to his observations about coloration.
When Bonnard began his sojourns on the Cote d’Azur he was a seasoned traveler, visiting Spain in 1901, then Algeria, and Tunisia in 1908, and, most importantly, two months at Saint-Tropez during the summer of 1909. So it is romanticizing his story to suggest that the south of France provided a revelation to the artist; more likely it concentrated his stored reactions to those previous experiences. Still, in a letter to his mother, he described it as an “ ‘Arabian Nights experience’, dazzled by “the sea, yellow walls, and reflections as colorful as the lights themselves.” Pierre and Marthe began to make yearly visits, staying at Saint-Tropez, Grasse, Antibes, and ultimately at Le Cannet where Bonnard bought a house in 1926.
At about the same time, Bonnard bought a little house on stilts at Vernonnet on the Seine in 1912, a house he called Ma Roulette (My Caravan). Although the climates of north and south differ, what connects Ma Roulette and Le Cannet is that both studios perched on summits overlooking their surroundings. Did Bonnard chose to live in studios that recreated the frames that he had worked within on his murals and decorative wall panels in the 1890s?
According to his nephew Charles Terrasse, Bonnard’s forties were “the years of anguish” for the artist. He responded to the new cubist art with a sense of inadequacy, questioning whether his own had reached a dead end. Picasso dismissed Bonnard’s work as insipid where Matisse, the more discerning, corrected him: “Bonnard is a great artist for our time and for posterity.” Matisse even considered Bonnard's work to be superior to his own and his estimate has been seconded by artists as different as Ellsworth Kelly and Fairfield Porter, who believed that Bonnard was the artist who laid out a path between representation and abstraction.Both these paintings of Marthe are less emotionally diffiuclt to read, if only for the prosaic reason that, being fully clothed, she seems more in possession of herself.
Bonnard always shows his most uncomplicated emotions in his pictures of children and, when his pets enter the picture, they steal the show. Bonnard painted The Little Girl With a Cat in 1894, the same year that he painted the more familiar White Cat (in the collection of the Musee d'Orsay) and their similarities are remarkable. In both, Bonnard uses distortion to suggest humor and curving lines to create a sense of motion. Whatever the highs and lows of his personal life, Bonnard was always capable of painting joy.
Sadly, for Bonnard the painter, his forties were “the years of anguish” , according to his nephew Charles Terrasse, He responded to the new cubist art with a sense of inadequacy, questioning whether his own had reached a dead end. Picasso dismissed Bonnard’s work as insipid where Matisse, the more discerning, corrected him: “Bonnard is a great artist for our time and for posterity.” Matisse even considered Bonnard's work to be superior to his own and his estimate has been seconded by artists as different as Ellsworth Kelly and Fairfield Porter, who believed that Bonnard was the artist who laid out a path between representation and abstraction
Images: from the collection of the Fondation Bemberg, Toulouse.
1. Pierre Boonard - Le cannet, 1930
2. Pierre Bonnard - L'Omnibus, 1901.
3. La femme au restaurant, c. 1900.
4. Pierre Bonnard - Nature morte aux citrons, (Still Life Wwith Lemons), c.1917.
5. Pierre Bonnard - La fillette au chat (Little girl with a cat) 1894.